Skip to content

Like butter

yacht-a know betterI was in a check-out line at Trader Joe’s recently, and the guy in front of me just had that douchey air about him.  You know what I’m talking about, right?  Maybe it was canvas loafers with no socks that screamed, “I’d rather be at my yacht club right now, har har har,” but something just really didn’t rub me the right way.  Then I listened in to the rather one-sided conversation he was having with the cashier:

Douchey McGee: You don’t carry margarine here, right?

Cashier: Yes, we have some.

Douchey McGee: Oh, well butter is so much healthier and natural that I wouldn’t expect you to carry margarine. 

Cashier: (smiling) Well, we do.

Douchey McGee: Did you know that margarine is naturally black in color?  It’s true; they add food coloring to make it look more like butter.

Cashier: I didn’t know that.

As I sat there questioning the veracity of his statement, she handed him his receipt, thanked him for coming in, and wished him a pleasant rest of the day.  I stepped up and faux-apologetically said, “Sorry I don’t have such interesting tidbits to share.”  She gave a large sigh of relief and said (surely breaking the friendly TJ’s code), “That is more than fine with me.  Did you hear what he was complaining about?”  “Margarine?” I offered.  “No, before that.  He was complaining that he had been on vacation for three weeks and so it was difficult for him to get up at 10am this morning.”  We agreed that his plight didn’t garner too much sympathy, wished each other well, and parted ways.

When I got home, I went online to fact-check his margarine origin story.  Wikipedia tells me: “Margarine naturally appears white or almost white.”  That makes much more sense.  More importantly, that guy was wrong with the trivia he brought up in the first place.  So if you’re scoring at home, that’s a douchey air about him, complaints regarding a three-week vacation, and false spontaneous trivia.  I think it’s pretty safe to say that I won’t be asking to hang out on that guy’s yacht anytime soon.  Har har har indeed.

Tags: ,

The doctor is insane

HouseI have a strong recommendation for all of you out there: If you’re sick and lying on a couch for hours at a time, DO NOT watch 3 or more successive episodes of “House.”  I did this about a week ago, and I spent the rest of the day thinking things like:

 

  • “Patient is still displaying a sore throat though clearly in the sneezing stage of the cold.  Let’s run an MRI on his kidneys to rule out Schmeckenberger’s Disease.” 
  • “The sinus pressure is most notable when pressing on the patient’s naso-labial folds.  What is that pressure hiding from us?  Check his home for any leaky faucets or wonton soup.  Those may indicate early pherminodermatitis.”
  • “Very interesting; he’s producing more mucus than his own body weight but the x-ray showed no esophageal inflammation.  Maybe that’s because the aggravated tissue belongs to…his alternate persona.  Start him on dioxytricyclodine.” 

My brain eventually stopped working like that (and the fake limp wore off), but please heed my advice: If you’re sick, you don’t want an extended stay at the fictional Princeton?Plainsboro Teaching Hospital.

Tags:

That’s Bullshit: Crossword puzzle edition

That's Bullshit!I do crossword puzzles enough that I feel I’m onto much of the trickery that the puzzlemakers employ.  For example, a clue might say, “Logical beginning?”  If it’s three letters, I know it’s likely to be “Eco,” since that’s a prefix that goes with the word “logical.”  Sometimes they still fool me, but I’ve gotten pretty good at knowing the clue’s angle immediately after reading it. 

I did a puzzle online this morning, however, that had one particularly troublesome clue for me: “Baseball card stat (3 letters).”  The thing is, I’ve seen that clue countless times over the years in various phrasings.  The answer is always “ERA” or “RBI.”  That’s it.  Just like when they ask for a Hebrew month, it’ll be “Adar,” and if the word “diarist” appears and the answer is three letters, it’s gonna be “Nin.”  That’s just how it works.  Well, I was having trouble getting the intersecting clues, so I didn’t know which answer it was going to be for this puzzle.  I was short on time and had everything but that top left corner completed, so I got into my desperate mode and changed the difficulty level of the puzzle from “Master” to “Regular.”  This allowed me to see if any letters were wrong by highlighting them in red.  So I went back to that clue.  First I put in an E, which was immediately red.  “Must be RBI this time,” I thought, until the R was red too.  “Ooh, changing it up, eh?”  Next I tried an A for “AVG” but found that red as well.  “Could they want HRs for homeruns?”  Apparently not, as the H was wrong.  I was very confused and checked to make sure I had read the clue correctly (which has unfortunately been the problem a few times in the past).  Yep.  “They couldn’t want OPS, could they?” I wondered.  OPS is an advanced stat used by baseball and fantasy baseball geeks but not much elsewhere.  Nope, O was wrong too.  BBs (the designation for walks)?  Wrong!  SBs for stolen bases?  Wrong again! 

I gave up and did what I absolutely hate to do: I went through the alphabet until I was right.  The first letter was…D.  “D?  For what, double plays?  That’s odd.”  But then the P was wrong.  I honestly couldn’t think of a baseball stat starting with D, and so I went back through the alphabet again.  (If you’re scoring at home, that’s for the first and second letter of a three-letter answer! The letter wheel this time stopped on…O.  “You bastards,” I thought, and then I typed in the final letter: B.  Yes, I suppose there is a Date of Birth on the back of a baseball card, but why the hell would the clue choose something with a dozen other abbreviated stat names when a DOB appears on every single form of identification?  “Driver’s license stat,” “Passport stat,” or even “First stat?” would’ve been fine with me.  But this…this was bullshit.

Tags: ,

Disappearing act

Don't you be like me!

Every so often, there will be a “Where are they now?” special that focuses on people who were briefly famous for one reason or another a while back.  I kinda like those, because it’s always a weird balance of “I’m only known for this one thing” and “I’m really tired of only being known for this one thing.”  What I don’t see often enough though are specials that focus on people who were at the top of their game for an extended period of time and then seemingly disappeared.  Oh sure, they’ll show me a special on what happened to “one-hit wonders” (in their respective fields) like The Knack, Mark Spitz, or the eventual show on actress Ellen Page.  But I’m more interested in those who experienced fame over the course of successive years and then had to deal with life when the well started to run dry. 

I bring this up because I was flipping through channels recently and saw that Mel Gibson’s movie, “What Women Want” was on.  In the scene I happened upon, he was talking to the formerly-ubiquitous…Helen Hunt.  Helen Hunt!  Wow, she used to be everywhere.  Even though I didn’t watch “Mad About You,” there were seven seasons of her on that show and in promos for it coming into our living rooms.  Near the end and shortly after that show, her movie career was as big as anyone’s.  She had the superbly-written “Twister” (yes, that’s sarcasm) and the multiple-award-winning “As Good As It Gets” in successive years while still on a weekly television comedy.  Then, after the show ended, she went on a tear.  2000 had “Dr. T and the Women” (which I never saw but still pops up in crossword puzzles from time to time), “Pay It Forward” (don’t get me started on this one), “Castaway,” and “What Women Want.”  Woody Allen’s “The Curse of the Jade Scorpion” came out in 2001, and I thought I’d never see the end of her.  (Don’t get me wrong, she was doing a fine job, but four highly-publicized movies the first year after a lengthy tv show ends and I start craving some diversity.)

Well, since 2001, things have changed.  I don’t know if it was a personal choice to get away from the craziness or she hit a magical age that makes producers stop calling (though she’s just one year older than Sandra Bullock). Either way, her next entry isn’t until 2004 (“A Good Woman,” which I’ve neither seen nor heard of).    A year later, she was on the tv miniseries of “Empire Falls,” and just two other released movies since then.  If you’re scoring at home, that’s four big movies in the year 2000, and five total IMDB titles since then.  There are two listings currently in post-production, so she’s definitely still working, but that’s a pretty noticeable fall from the public eye and it was a bit of a shock when I saw her on the screen a couple of days ago.  I happen to think that a three year absence after four Emmys, three Golden Globes, and an Academy Award is noteworthy.  Was there a pervasive societal sense of a Helen Hunt overload?  If so, I’d better start writing my “Whatever happened to Jennifer Aniston?” post now.  Ya know, just to be prepared.

Tags: ,

Wax Off

In 1984, Karate Kid instantly became one of my favorite movies.  I Absolutely loved it and still do.  Thanks to Karate Kid, I can block a punch to the chest if I just “wax on, wax off.”  I know that any injury can be cured if I rub my hands together really fast and slap the damaged body part.  Don’t get me started on the acting.  Did you know that Pat Morita was nominated for an Oscar for his portrayal of Mr. Miyagi.  No joke.

So when I learned that someone recently decided to remake KK, I cringed a little.  Now that I’ve learned more about the new film and the changes they’ve made, I am rooting for a complete and epic fail.  Here’s how I imagine the conversation to green light the new Karate Kid went…

Producer:  We want to re-make Karate Kid.

Studio Exec:  I love it.  The KK franchise has made us a ton of money of the years.  So who’s going to play Daniel Laruso?

Producer: Actually, we’re changing it up a bit, the kid’s name is going to be Dre.

Studio Exec:  Sounds urban.  Inner city youth battles gangs with Karate?

Producer:  Not exactly. We got Will Smith’s kid to play Dre, but he’s only eleven, so that’s a little young to be fighting gangs.

Studio Exec:  Okay, but we’re still in the inner city, right?

Producer:  Actually, I’ve never been to China, so I just thought we’d shoot it there.

Studio Exec:  Cool.  But isn’t Kung Fu the main martial art in China.  Shouldn’t the movie be named Kung Fu kid?

Producer:  Nobody will catch that.

Studio Exec:  You’re probably right.  So who’s going to play Miyagi?  Casting will be key.  I mean, Morita was nominated for an Oscar in the original.

Producer:  Remember, we’re in China, so its going to be Mr. Han and we’ve got Jackie Chan all locked up.

Studio Exec.:  China.  Right.  I love Jackie Chan, but he can’t act and he really doesn’t even speak English.  I’m guessing he’s not going to bring an Oscar worthy performance.

Producer:  No Jackie will not be getting any Oscar nods.  Ever.

Studio Exec.:  Well is he still going to teach Dre important life and spiritual lessons through the art of Kung Fu (Karate)?

Producer:  No, but the kid is going to accidentally kick Jackie in the face a few times and Jackie does this hillarious thing where he rubs his nose and makes a funny face.

Studio Exec:  Can we get the kid to kick him in the balls?

Producer:  Done.

Studio Exec:   One more thought.  Vampires are hot right now, can we make Han a vampire?

Producer:  You got it.  Let’s make a picture.

Okay, I may be reaching a little on the vampire idea, but I’m pretty sure the rest of the conversation took place.  Is it going to be as bad as I think?

Everything’s coming up roses

SlashWhat a wonderful world of instant information we live in.  Thanks to the series of tubesthat make up the internets, every bit of information seems to be accessible.  I find this to be helpful more times than I can count over the course of a month, and while I know not everything out there is accurate, I don’t typically do broad searches for things that require high levels of detail.

One example of how beneficial the internet can be happens every six months or so.  My friend Jon and I make cd mixes for each other when we get to hang out a couple of times a year.  (Go ahead, insert your own “Know how I know you’re gay” joke here.  I can take it.)  The presentation of these cds couldn’t be more different.  I hand him a jewel case that has a thematic name on the front, like “Jon’s Turkey Day Mix” or “Jon’s Summer 09 Mix.”  On the inside of the case, I’ve printed out the artists and song names.  On the disc itself, I write the mix’s name as neatly as I can (which admittedly isn’t very neat).  When he hands me his mix, it’s a disc with no writing on it that may or may not have a case to call home.  I put it in my computer and iTunes doesn’t recognize the tracks, which means it’s up to me to find out what the hell I’m listening to.  Thankfully, modern life has equipped me with the tools to handle such harrowing events.  For example, one of the songs on my last untitled mix began with the line, “Sweep up, little sweeper boy.”  I used the Google and started typing in that line.  After only two words, the rest of the line appeared.  I hit enter, and the second entry told me that Jon gave me “Shampoo” by someone named Elvis Perkins.  Ta-frickin-dah!  I did that for all 20ish songs and I was set (with a little sense of accomplishment too, might I add).

As you all know, this level of information has not been readily available for all too long.  There was no internet when I grew up, and it’s been fascinating to watch it turn into what it is at this moment.  During this whole time, I’ve held onto something as a test to see just how much information is out there, and I’m about to share that with you:

In the summer of 1992, that same friend Jon and I went with his parents to a beach house for about a week.  For the majority of the day, we watched MTV and saw the same videos over and over again.  Headlining at that time were the videos for “Evenflow” by Pearl Jam, the infectious “Life is a Highway” by Tom Cochrane, and most notably, “November Rain” by Guns N’ Roses.  I say it’s the most notable because it’s nine minutes long and it led to endless discussions about what the hell was going on in the video.  It tells a story, but suddenly the female lead is dead and we can’t tell when, why, how, or by whose hand.  We formed some theory about Slash (the guitarist) taking her out so that he and Axl Rose could continue their illicit love affair, but neither of us really believed it.  At the end of the nine minutes, the screen tells us that it was based on “Without You” by Del James.  Therein lied the answer to all of our questions, but how the hell would we find that?

Just a couple of years later, the days of card catalogs at libraries were a thing of the past, and everything switched to computerized systems instead.  While getting books for a class in high school, a light bulb went off.  I typed in the title and author, and upon getting zero results, tried them individually.  Still nothing.  Bastards.  Fast-forward a couple more years, and I gave it the old college try.  First, I used the school’s library system that also checked several other campuses’ volumes, but I came up with nothing.  Next, I went to the all text-based internet (via dial-up modem, naturally) that I used for what passed as email back then.  I thought I had a good shot since it had helped me find lyrics to an album by Argentine rock star Fito Paez. If it could do that for me, a little GNR should be no problem, right?  Wrong.

The new millennium arrived, and by this time, we had something very close to the internet we know and love today.  I don’t remember how, but I thought of my quest and tried it out again with a fancy-schmancy search engine.  I didn’t find it, but I found one other person looking for it too.  He had written something about the video and that he wished he could find “Without You” by Del James to get the whole story.  I felt like I was getting closer.

Well friends, every P-Dawg has his day.  Several months ago, I tried again.  The first thing that got my hopes up was when Google auto-completed my request (as it had for “Sweep up, little sweeper boy”).  Then the results came up, and I grinned from ear-to-ear.  The first site I looked at said that the author was finally going to read something he’d waited 15 years to find.  I clicked on the provided link, but that site no longer existed.  I clicked on the second one with brought me to Modcult.org, which said that the following story “might be of interest to your former teenage self.”  That link was dead too.  Crap.  Third time’s the charm?  Third time’s the charm!  There it is, everyone, all eleven pages of a story that I’d searched for off and on for 17 years.  The internet finally got to the stage that I hoped it would, revealing the secrets that I yearned for as an angsty 9th-grader.

I’ve had that link in my inbox for a few months now, and I think I’m finally about to sit down and read it.  I don’t know why it’s taken so long, but I think this is something I have to do.  Between now and when the clock strikes 2010, I’m going to re-watch the video that entertained me for untold hours and then cuddle up with my laptop.  I have a feeling that I’ll be disappointed and probably just as confused about the video as before, but thanks to the internet, I’ll experience that sweet sensation of closure. Look out, Axl, here I come!

Tags: ,

That’s Bullshit: Idiom edition

That's Bullshit!I tend to think (and over-think) a lot about words and phrases.  And yet, there are everyday sayings that come to my ears or from my mouth that I’ve never stopped to analyze before.   (This is similar to my interaction with celebrity names that I learned as a child.  It wasn’t until I was 20 years old that I said, “Wait a minute, her name is Sigourney?”)

Well today, my friends, I’m not letting one of these idioms pass me by without giving it some careful consideration.   That phrase is: “Let the cat out of the bag.”  To me, there’s a slightly negative connotation to that, as if the speaker might not be at liberty to divulge whatever secret s/he is spilling.  Even if you disagree with that part of what I’m saying, I hope we can all agree on my main point: We should be focusing our attention instead on who put the cat in the bag in the first place.  How does that guy not even get a mention?  At best, it’s terrifying a domesticated animal.  At best!  Then we get into whether or not the bag had any holes in it for the cat to breathe during its time of imprisonment.  I think the authorities would be very interested in that point, don’t you?  Even if the bag didn’t explicitly say, “This bag is not a toy,” we as a people are smart enough to know that by now. 

So next time someone says that they “let the cat out of the bag,” I’m going to interrupt him and say, “You, sir, are a hero.”  To anyone who thinks otherwise…that’s bullshit.

Tags: ,

Tiger

resize
For those who don’t know me, I am a fan of all things golf.  I was in Mexico when the Tiger story broke, so I didn’t have any access to American news media.  In fact, the first bits and pieces of the story came to me from a drunk dude at the pool bar, not necessarily the most reliable source.  When I got back home, I was surprised to find that even the strangest aspects of the story that I got from drunk dude were pretty close to the reported facts.
 
As the allegations of cheating (on and off the course) continue to trickle in, to me, the car accident continues to be the most facinating part of the whole story.  It looks like Tiger’s wife actually told the police that she used a golf club to smash out the rear window to rescue Tiger.  Bizarre.  There are so many questions that haven’t been answered.   But the thing that is absolutely driving me crazy, is that no one has reported on what club she used.
 
Was it a putter, a wood or an iron?  Steel or graphite?  I’m guessing if it was one of Tiger’s clubs it was a stiff shaft (see what I did there?). 
 
Most importantly, if it was the driver, was Frank (the talking head-cover) still there at the time of the window smashing?  
 
Has anyone even seen Frank lately?  Maybe he needs medical attention.  No one seems to care.   We need to get to the bottom of this.  Something tells me he’d be willing and able to shed a lot of light on this story.

Not giving a shift

question markMy homey Rockabye brought up an interesting topic over IM last week: why do certain punctuation marks on the standard keyboard require a shift key to type them when other seemingly less-common ones do not?  This made me stare at my keyboard for a while and come up with a few very strong opinions:

 

  • Whoever decided on what goes where did a good job with the shiftless period and the comma.  The period is going to end the vast majority of sentences, so it’s good to make that one as easy as possible.  And, might I add, all of the “dots” we type in urls (which certainly weren’t taken into consideration back in the day) made the period’s usage go up even more.  Second, the comma, depending on who you are and how liberal your usage is, can figure quite prominently in emails, documents, and blog posts.  I realize hitting a shift key is not a terrible hardship, but it is a tiny extra step that, when multiplied by the gajillion times I hit those two keys, would certainly add up.
  • Another one of which I approve is the hyphen key (after the zero).  I use “-” so much more often than the rare “_” that I would probably be devoting an entire angry bullet point here if they were reversed.  So well done…whoever.
  • The first shift-key-needed choice that comes into question for me is…the question mark.  Yeah, I use the slash from time to time, but not nearly as often the question mark.  Not only that, if I’m typing on my computer at work which has the separate number keys to the right, I can use the slash key above those instead of the one hogging the question mark key.  That said, those slashes are used in the aforementioned urls and they’re probably needed for a whole bunch of programming stuff I don’t understand, so there are likely large groups of people who like the slash’s shiftless status.  (I’m pretty sure that’s the first time I’ve ever written “slash’s shiftless status.”  Hey, now I’ve done it twice!)
  • I probably use semi-colons more than the average person; I enjoy their unique contribution to the punctuation society.  That said, I still use the colon more often and think those two should be reversed.  It’s that simple for me: if it gets used more, it should be easier (even microscopically) to use.  But like my doctor always says, if you’re having a hard time finding the colon, just keep searching and you’ll eventually find it. 
  • I have no quarrel with the plus and equal signs.  I use both infrequently and would probably go to the ones by the number keys anyway.  They can stay where they are.
  • Now we get to my two biggest problems and my proposed solutions.  First up, the lovely parentheses.  I use these guys quite often (if you haven’t noticed), and yet I have to hit the shift key every time.  However, the bracket keys (next to the P) don’t require it.  I so rarely use those keys that  I honestly can’t remember the last time I did, and I’m pretty sure I have never used the weird bracket things sharing those keys with them.  Why do the brackets get their own keys when parentheses don’t?  That’s bullshift! (Thank you, thank you.)   I propose we swap those immediately.  I’ll get used to finding my parentheses elsewhere in no time.
  • Second, I use quotation marks fairly often.  Not only that, there are millions of people out there using them incorrectly every day to bump their usage up even more.  Here’s the problem: it’s the shifted version of the apostrophe key, which gets even more play.  What to do?  Oh I know what to do.  See the key to the left of the 1 that has some kind of backwards apostrophe (or accent mark) and what appears to be a tilde?  Yeah, neither of those need top-billing.  Here’s the plan: we make that key the question mark (right next to its cousin, the exclamation) and slash key.  The reverse apostrophe goes over the current apostrophe, and the quotation (with the tilde above it) goes where the current slash/question mark are.  Ta-dah!  Problems solved.
  • Lastly, do you see that key to the right of the seldom-used brackets? If your keyboard is like mine, then it’s a forward slash on the bottom and something I honestly don’t think I’ve ever looked at above it.  I’m sure someone uses it for something, but seriously, fuck that key.

So I guess I had a couple of thoughts on the subject.  How about you, fearless readers?  What did I leave out and where do you think I’m wayoff target?  (Ya know, aside from caring about punctuation placement on a keyboard.)

Tags: ,

The flash of love

flashing stop signLast weekend, my lovely wife said that her mom would like our help in putting something together.  “What is it?” I asked.  “I think it’s something for her garage that makes a flashing noise when the car gets too close,” she replied.  Being from a long line of smart asses, I asked exactly what sound a flash makes.  Apparently it sounds just like her middle finger.  Who knew?

Tags: